What needs to be funded, and when?
Separate the cash you need now from the wealth intended for later. Borrowing can provide cash, but you still have a loan to repay.
CONCENTRATED WEALTH / A FAMILY DECISION
What does your family need these shares to fund? A sale can provide cash and reduce direct company exposure, while leaving a substantial holding and built-in gain to manage. The example shows the cash available and the stock and gain that remain.
Define the cash need and constraints ↓Go straight to the worksheet ↗
CASH NEEDS AND CONSTRAINTS
The shares may represent decades of work. They may also be expected to fund retirement, a child’s inheritance, or continued ownership of the company you helped build. Those commitments shape how much you can sell—and how much you can place beyond easy reach.
Before comparing strategies, be clear about your family’s spending needs, exposure to the company and need for control.
Separate the cash you need now from the wealth intended for later. Borrowing can provide cash, but you still have a loan to repay.
Count the shares you hold directly and through funds, alongside any income tied to the company.
Access, voting rights and the ability to change your mind can matter as much as tax timing.
HYPOTHETICAL PARTIAL-SALE EXAMPLE
Consider a family with $12.5m invested, including $7.5m in one company. They need $1m for spending. A $1.5m stock sale meets that need under the assumptions below, but it does not resolve the entire concentration.
Use the worksheet afterward ↗The stock is worth more than all the other investments combined. Its value and cost basis are different parts of the decision.
of the portfolio is in one company.
The family sells $1.5m of shares. Some proceeds fund spending, some are reserved on the gain, and the balance stays invested.
The family’s spending need
After the withdrawal and reserve, $6m remains in the company. The cash need has been met, while the unsold shares still carry company risk and built-in gain.
of the remaining portfolio is still in the company.
The $5.164m includes the $164,000 of retained sale cash.
Fixed hypothetical example. $12.5m starting portfolio · $1.5m stock sale · $1m withdrawal. The 28% gain reserve is an assumption, not estimated tax.
Full example & comparison ↓The reserve is hypothetical, not estimated tax. This fixed example is separate from the editable worksheet later in the article.
PARTIAL-SALE COMPARISON
Use the worksheet to compare a partial stock sale with raising the same withdrawal from other assets. Change the sale, cash need and reserve assumptions, then examine what remains invested.
AFTER THE FUNDED WITHDRAWAL
$6m of $11.164m remaining invested
Withdrawal funded from other assets.
Withdrawal funded from sale proceeds.
■ One company■ Other assets & retained cash
Concentration is a share of remaining investable assets, not a risk forecast. Other assets, such as funds, may also hold this same company’s shares (indirect issuer exposure); that exposure is excluded here.
The withdrawal leaves the investment portfolio; it is not counted as investment loss. Each reserve is separately earmarked and may differ from eventual tax.
The result can help you ask your advisers how to cover any cash shortfall, assess the company exposure that remains and review the terms of another proposed strategy.
COMPARE THE OPTIONS
The example meets a spending need and leaves a large company holding. Other approaches change that balance in different ways. Compare each proposal by its cash, remaining exposure and gain, restrictions, and eventual exit.
What changes: A sale can reduce direct issuer exposure—the shares of the company you hold outright—and release cash, with gain recognition. A staged plan spreads decisions across time while retaining exposure between sales.
What remains: Unsold shares still carry risk and embedded gain. Trading windows, tax lots, costs, and future cash needs belong in the plan.
Ask: What gain would the sale recognize, and how much loss on the unsold shares could the family absorb?
What changes: A separate strategy may generate gains and losses and alter exposures. Harvested losses are not a guarantee of an offset, and the original issuer position does not disappear.
What remains: Financing, fees, leverage, wash-sale coordination, basis changes, and eventual unwinding. Ask for the manager’s and custodian’s actual proposal before modeling benefits.
Ask: What happens when usable losses are scarce—or when we close the strategy?
What changes: A contribution can exchange direct ownership for an interest in a pooled vehicle, subject to its legal and investment requirements.
What remains: Fund restrictions, fees, underlying exposures, and future recognition. This is a different transaction from an ETF contribution under §351.
Ask: When and in what form can assets leave—and what gain follows them?
What changes: Ownership form may change without immediate recognition when the applicable conditions are satisfied.
What remains: Investment-company and diversification rules, control, carryover basis, underlying issuer exposure, and scrutiny of the complete plan. A new wrapper alone does not establish diversification.
Ask: What securities go in, who owns what afterward, and which transactions are already contemplated?
What changes: A contract can reshape exposure or make borrowing possible. Cash from borrowing is accompanied by debt.
What remains: Collateral terms, maturity, repayment, counterparty exposure, foregone upside, and tax characterization. No universal collar percentage establishes a tax safe harbor.
Ask: What happens at a margin call, a contract adjustment, and final settlement?
What changes: An outright charitable gift or a charitable remainder structure can serve a genuine charitable objective. They have different ownership and cash-flow consequences.
What remains: Assets committed to charity are not freely spendable family principal. A trust income interest is not equivalent to access to the contributed assets.
Ask: Would we still want the charitable commitment if the tax result were less attractive?
An ETF contribution needs a closer look because changing the form of ownership does not, by itself, settle the tax or concentration questions.
Legal foundations and limitations: IRS Publication 550, §721, §351, and IRS charitable remainder trust guidance. The economics of these contracts still need research and a review of the actual terms.
SECTION 351 UPDATE · SOURCES REVIEWED 16 OCTOBER 2026
An ETF proposal must be examined as a complete plan. The IRS materials discussed here address a particular sequence; the diagram follows the securities and ETF shares through that sequence.
Publicly issued September 28, 2026; assigned to the October 19 bulletin. Diagram is an illustration, not an eligibility result. IRS announcement ↗
Trace the securities and ETF shares in each step.
The investor contributes an appreciated, already diversified portfolio and receives ETF shares.
An authorized participant—one of the large trading firms that create and redeem ETF shares—contributes securities that fit the ETF’s investment thesis, or cash, for ETF shares.
Under the same plan, the ETF redeems the AP’s shares using securities the investor contributed.
All three steps are part of one plan. In step 3, the investor’s contributed securities reach the AP. The ruling treats the investor as making a taxable §1001 exchange of those securities.
Rev. Rul. 2026-20 treats the investor as disposing of the contributed securities used in that redemption in a taxable §1001 exchange with the authorized participant. Multiple investors do not change the result.
Read the ruling, pp. 5–6 ↗Notice 2026-62 leaves specified thesis-consistent ETF seeding transactions outside its discussion when assets are intended and expected to be retained absent a substantial change in circumstances. It does not approve those transactions.
Read the notice, §2.02(2), pp. 9–10 ↗Bring your advisers the vehicle and ownership structure, each contributor’s basket, control and consideration, every planned later step, basis and the intended exit. Ask qualified advisers to evaluate the investment-company rules and other tax questions.
The 25/50 diversified-portfolio exception concerns each contributor’s portfolio; a diversified aggregate pool does not by itself establish it. 26 CFR §1.351-1(c)(5)–(6). This checklist does not determine whether a transaction qualifies.
ADVISER PREPARATION
Print the worksheet with your current assumptions. Bring it alongside the family’s spending priorities, the company exposure you are prepared to keep, and the terms of any alternative proposal.
Your entries stay in this page’s memory. No account is created, and the entries are not stored, sent to analytics or submitted. Reloading resets the illustration.
Altar Rock · Advice for your family
A sale changes the cash you have available and the amount still tied to the company. Andrew Barnes and the Altar Rock team can review those tradeoffs with you in light of your lifetime spending, wealth-transfer plans and philanthropic goals.
Tell us what you are considering and what you need help assessing. You choose what to share.
Altar Rock advisory team
These guides and tools are educational examples. Advice for your family requires a review of your circumstances with the appropriate investment, tax and legal advisers.